All were kinda random with mixed tape formulations, speed, some tracks were on repro, others on input and general wonky calibration. But none of the channels matched and it sounded WAY better bypassed. was they had the UAD studer across all the tracks, like a real tape machine. One of the first things i noticed, and fixed. So they sent a couple tunes out to myself & others and finally we decided to pull up their ITB mixes and go through it all. Real problems with frequency balance and things like vocals being much, much brighter then cymbals or anything else etc. When I first started that record they had already mixed it themselves and by all accounts they mixes weren't great. they give you more then enough rope to hang yourself from the rafters. but if I had to pick one over the other it'd be the UAD stuff simply because it allows you to actually setup and do an alignment.Īnd that's the rub. Obviously I have some mixed feelings about 'em all. The added control of UAD tape sims is the key to making 'em work and they all respond more or less about the same as an actual tape machine. That's why people love and still use tape, because its soft, gooey and very forgiving. Click to expand.Real tape has never really "sizzled" or been know for extended high frequency response.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |